![]() |
Bette Davis plots doom and death in The Letter. Can she be caught? |
Director: William Wyler
Cast: Bette Davis (Leslie Crosbie), Herbert Marshall (Robert
Crosbie), James Stephenson (Howard Joyce), Frieda Inescort (Dorothy Joyce),
Gale Sondergaard (Mrs Hammond), Bruce Lester (John Withers), Elizabeth Earl
(Adele Ainsworth), Cecil Kellaway (Prescott), Sen Yung (Ong Chi Seng)
The “woman’s picture” was a popular genre of the 1940s, a
catch-all for stories that centred around women dealing with domestic issues in
the home or in relationships, with the lady herself the driving force of the
narrative. There were several stars who excelled in this wide-ranging genre,
but the best was perhaps Bette Davis. This melodrama is a superb example of
exactly this sort of female-led narrative, focusing in on its heroine making
catastrophic decisions that lead to terrible consequences.
On a plantation in Malaya, in the late 1930s, Leslie Crosbie
(Bette Davis) the wife of gentle plantation owner Robert (Herbert Marshall)
guns down a man, Geoff Hammond, who comes to visit her in her home alone. She
insists to her husband, and their lawyer Howard Joyce (James Stephenson), that
she was defending her honour. The trial for murder feels like a formality –
until Joyce’s clerk Ong Chi Seng (Sen Yung) informs him that Hammond had a Eurasian
wife (Gale Sondergaard) who has a letter from Leslie to the dead man which
casts a very different light on the affair. Because “affair” is the right word:
the letter implies Leslie invited the man to visit her while her husband was
out. Mrs Hammond will hand the letters over to the authority – unless Leslie
and Joyce cough up a huge sum of money to stop her.
The Letter is a
film with two marvellous book-end scenes. The first is a beautifully shot and
assembled murder sequence, where Wyler’s camera moodily pans through the
sleeping native workers on the plantation – dappled by moonlight – until it
finds itself drawn towards the steps of the plantation house by the sounds of
gunfire. It’s a superbly marshalled sequence that mixes stillness and quiet
from the start with a sudden explosion of noise, reflected in the shift in
editing from slow camera movements to fast cuts. Nothing else in the film quite
matches it until we reach the final sequence that mirrors it with Bette Davis
heading back outside into the moonlight, where a terrible and violent surprise
awaits her.
And you can enjoy that because no-one did these brutal,
arrogant, high-society queens as well as Bette Davis. Davis is superb here,
bringing just the right touch of melodrama to balance the intensity of Leslie’s
selfish desperation to get away with what we immediately know is an act of
murder. Leslie Crosbie is entitled, arch and a natural liar who carefully
builds a series of alternative stories (each of them less believable than the
one before) which she spins carefully with a mix of vulnerability and a dash of
feminine weakness, to try and get away with murder. It’s a domineeringly strong
performance that powers the entire film and Wyler draws a wonderful arch
cruelty from her, just below the surface of her acceptable female hobbies of
knitting and dinner planning.
Wyler balances this with the two men around her, both of
whom are under her spell to different degrees. Herbert Marshall is very good as
her husband, a generous, loving, naïve soul who believes his wife without
question until he later realises he shouldn’t. Marshall does an excellent job
with making this hen-pecked weakling intriguing, not least in his later passive-aggressive
response when discovering most of his fortune has been blown to save his wife
from a certain death sentence.
The other man is her lawyer Howard Joyce, played with a
patrician reserve by James Stephenson. Oscar-nominated for the role,
Stephenson’s Joyce doubts everything he is told from the very start, but
somehow allows himself to be dragged along with the cover-up that slowly
develops. Whether this is out of pride, or whether this is because he is
himself somehow under some sort of erotic spell that she emits is left open to
question. Either way, Stephenson puts a wonderful growing aghast horror behind
the role as his professional and moral scruples are challenged more and more.
The chicanery of Davis’ character in the film is of course
helped by her being white and rich, and prejudices against Hammond (not to
mention the reception his Eurasian wife expects to gets if she comes forward)
are most of the mainstay of the case in her defence. Joyce basically speaks
platitudes about professional integrity, while all but knowingly defending a
murderer (he in fact goes out of his way to give himself plausible denial and
avoids questions). The film manages to present the native workers on the
plantation – and Joyce’s clerk – as something a bit more than this, as perhaps
the only people in the film with actual integrity.
But of course Davis gets away with it, because she can pay
to do so, but the film finds other ways to punish her (as these women’s
pictures usually do for adultery). The film’s final sequences see Davis’
character slowly collapse from arrogant certainty into moral and mental
torture, before almost willingly marching towards certain danger. Wyler’s film
is a great vehicle for her, but it’s also superbly made and shot and captures
the sweaty lack of justice in the British Empire with perfection.
No comments:
Post a comment